🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a flawed view of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "woke" agendas represent an existential risk to the continent's identity. Yet, this perspective is based on a serious misreading of the situation. The actual danger confronting Europe is not societal but economic and technological backwardness.

A Glaring Economic Gap Separating the US and Europe

Statistics reveal a sobering picture. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by 87%, compared to a paltry thirteen and a half percent growth for the EU. Over this period, EU GDP per capita dropped from over three-quarters to just half of the US level. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than major EU nations like France and Italy.

Today, about 50% of the global 50 largest technology firms are US-based, while a mere four are European.

The Innovation Shortfall: A Critical Problem

The growing disparity is driven by stronger productivity growth in the United States, largely due to technological innovation and better use of resources. The scene of world technology dominance is overwhelmingly American. In the last fifty years, hundreds of American startups have scaled into companies valued at over $10bn, compared with just 14 in the European continent.

This gap raises a vital issue: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, where does Europe positioned? Most analysts agree it is largely a two-horse race involving the US and China, with European nations entering at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of Europe's Technological Lag

Several major reasons account for this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a much more robust and agile network for financing new ventures. Europe still lacks a true unified investment market, a factor that limits the scale of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided regulation hamper Europe. A US startup can launch a product under a single set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a larger population size, is split among 27 different national systems, creating huge internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on risk-taking vary greatly. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has weakened its ability in pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Despite these hurdles, one can find reasons for optimism. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to propose substantial change. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the internal market highlight the need for sweeping reforms.

With the right incentives and regulatory reforms, these assets could support much higher degrees of commercial innovation.

Europe retains considerable strengths: skilled human capital, top-tier education systems, and world-class research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Importantly, even if Europe does not become the leader in creating next-generation tech, it can still dramatically boost economic output by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now faces a critical moment. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, the continent's slide in innovation has been gradual. However, without bold steps to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible loss of global economic relevance.